Wednesday, November 30, 2016

How humans are killing fish around the world.


The ecosystems of the world depend on fish heavily.  Whether it be in underwater food chains, or above ground food chains, we need fish.  In many countries around the world, fish are the main source of protein.  Even here in the United States, we eat a ton of fish.  Sometimes we don’t even know we are eating a fish product, whether it is in fake crabmeat, or other products.  But point of this being we as a planet need fish.  They play a huge role in aspects of industry, farming, and the ecosystem.  While it may shock you to find out that humans are absolutely decimating and contaminating fish populations around the world.  We are overfishing our seas and lakes almost to the point of no return. 
And it is important to note its not just fish either.  We are also over harvesting crabs, shrimp, etc.  Despite mildly strict fishing regulations in the US, we are still taking out too many fish.  So you can only imagine the extent of that problem with little to no harvesting regulations in those countries.  And because many fish have very large migration patterns, spreading from continent to continent even, this hurts fisheries around the world.  This demotivates country to protect their fish.  Why should they not over fish them and miss out on revenue, just to have another country take advantage of that.  It’s a sense of if you don’t take it, someone else will.  And this is not the right way to go about taking care of our natural resources.  And the fish that are left, well they are not all necessarily healthy.  We are polluting our oceans at an alarming rate as well.  And these chemicals are being absorbed by our fish.  The nuclear reactor melt down in Japan for example, killed millions of fish and contaminated even more.  Some predatory fish can get increased levels or chemicals like mercury by eating smaller organisms repetitively.  And aside from other fish, only one organism consumes more fish, and that is humans.  So those chemicals that we are putting straight into our oceans are ending up right back in our bodies.  It’s a sort of “pollution karma” if you will.  And some populations of humans eat more fish than others; therefore having higher concentration of chemicals in them.  Asian countries like Japan eat fish at an alarming rate.  And some of those fish are not caught to far away from the location of the nuclear melt down.  Scientist have went into these local fish markets and actually tested the tissue of fish for sale.  And the results were not so comforting; chemicals were found in high levels in fish tissue.  This was especially prevalent in larger predatory fish, like the blue fin tuna for example.  But this isn’t unique to Asia by any means.  Lake Erie has elevated mercury and other chemical levels in its fish too.  The EPA recommends that fish coming from the Ohio shore of Lake Erie are eaten no more than once a month.  Other professional regulations say that it should be even longer than that, especially in predatory fish like the walleye.  The world needs to take action and help protect our fish, because in the end, it is a matter of protecting ourselves.

Hazardous Wastes

In the United States and around the world, hundreds of thousands of industrial processes are taking place everyday.  This has been going on 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, since the industrial revolution in the United States.  In the United States we really do produce almost any type of product you can think of.  This means millions of tons of raw materials, chemicals, equipment, machinery etc.  Unfortunately, many chemicals and materials used in industrial processes are pretty dangerous to either humans, or the environment.  We often produce hazardous waste products that are not easily disposed of.  This has been a substantial problem for manufacturing since the industrial revolution in the US.  The general consensus used to be as follows; if a worker takes a job, they assume and accept all risk associated with that job.  Meaning if you got sick due to chemical exposure, you accepted that risk and you couldn’t put blame on the corporation.  Of course, this is not the way we think today.  We want to reduce the contact our workers have with hazardous materials and wastes as much as we possibly can.  But this is often times a more challenging task than one may think.  Unfortunately, the history of doing this has been a sort of trial and error process.  Not all exposures are as obvious as you may think.  For example dust in the air is noticeable and can be addressed fairly straightforwardly.  But things like radiation are not so easy to detect, you need special instrumentation and knowledge.  This can be seen in the industrial revolution with the women painting watches with radioactive glow paint and getting radiation poisoning.  In today’s world we are more careful but just some of the things a worker can encounter include; strong acids, strong bases, carcinogens, radioactive substances, mutagens, flammable materials, and more.  We as safety professionals are aware of the risk factors, and signs of exposure to these substances.  Many people think safety is “common sense” but chemical safety is an example that contradicts that.  Somebody not educated in this type of work may overlook exposure routes like aerosols etc.  They may overlook things like the proper container to use when working with acidic or basic chemicals.  A special container is needed to contain a strong acid or base in many settings.  If an improper container is used, a leak will result.  This leaked chemical can than eat the containers of other chemicals and cause a potentially very large problem.  These chemicals are also dangerous to the environment as wastes.  For example, landfills are known to seep harmful spent chemicals like motor oil into the soil and ground water.
  For reasons like that, we see regulations put in place over time to try and avoid these situations.  But chemicals often find their way into our environment through other routes.  An example being just down the drain in our homes.  People don’t tend to think about that as they pour things down the drain because they assume it will somehow be taken out.  But that isn’t always the case.  Even things like remnants of birth control can remain in the water even after it is treated and detected in ground water.  We as a society need to be more aware about what happens to our chemicals once we are done using them. 

Monday, November 28, 2016

How we make used tires into roadways


As the world becomes increasing linked and mobile, so does the amount of cars on the road.  And naturally, as the amount of people with cars increases, so does the amount of tires we use.  This is especially prevalent in the United States.  In the United States, 77% of used car tires are illegally dumped, or sent to landfills.  And considering approximately 242 million tires are discarded annually, that is a monumental amount of waste product. 
Although the problem of getting rid of tires has grown exponentially, it is by no means a new problem.  When a car comes to the end of its life, it is scrapped.  A scrap yard will take the usable parts off the car for resale, and the rest of the metal on the car is recycled.  But what about the tires?   Well do to the chemical bonding used to create tires; we could never do much with them.  They cannot for example be melted down into new tires.  Not to mention, tires come in many different varieties, all having different properties and different chemical formulas.  So what has happened to these tires historically?  Well nothing, but try and dispose of them in a dumpster and expect to receive a ticket.  Try and put them in your trash for the garbage men to pick up, and expect them to leave them their.  It is illegal in many places to simply “throw away” tires.  So what do we do with them?  Well many times you need to take them to a tire distributer or recycling plant, and maybe even pay them to take the tires.   Tires are then stock piled, were they sit, collect water, and leach chemicals into the environment.  Well now, finally, we have something to do with them.  We can now re-integrate the rubber into an asphalt mix.  The tire is ground up into little pieces, the metal belts are removed and recycle, and the rubber is heated up and added to asphalt.  This is a great way to recycle tires, but also really benefits the asphalt we lay on our roads.  This “rubber infused” material provides a lot of benefits when compared to its counterpart.  Tires grip the road much better when it has the recycled compound in it, making for better traction.  This makes for safer roadways.  The compound is also slightly flexible, which is the main benefit.  The United States has one of the poorest and oldest infrastructures of other prominent countries.  Partly because we simply cannot repair our roads as fast as they fall apart.  The reason asphalt on roads breaks apart is largely due to the ground moving.  Especially in regions were the ground freezes and thaws.  Well this new rubber infused asphalt flexes to counteract that.  This proves for a much longer pavement life, which translates directly into saving money.  So overall, this process gets rid of used tire hoards, it makes our roads last longer, and it saves money!  And those are all largely beneficial to the country, and the world. 

Saturday, November 12, 2016

Urbanization


In today’s world, more than half of all people live in an area that is considered urban.  By mid century, this number is expected to grow to around 70 percent of all people living in an urban environment.   But 100 years ago, only 2/10 people lived in what we would consider a city.  As we all know, humans were once hunters and gatherers.  Often times traveling to follow their food source.  A turning point in society was when humans began to utilize selective breeding in food production.  Once we learned how to grow animals and food in one spot, we were able to establish semi-permanent or permanent communities.  This is where urbanization really began to start.   Irrigation, soil tilling, and crop rotation also helped increase our food production.  Eventually humans got to a point in time where not everyone had to be producing food.  This led to the development of other trades and eventually, industry.  This caused trade to flourish, and as trade grew, so did technology.  This is the first time we began to develop what we would call today, a city.  With cities popping up all over the world, we needed to create an infrastructure system.  People began to move to the cities from rural communities for work to build this infrastructure.  In today’s world, urbanization is continuing to grow, as is our population.  People are moving out of rural communities to work in cities as the United States and the world moves more towards a service economy.  So how do we accommodate for all these people entering our cities?  Also, it is important to consider what impact on our environment this will have, and what our infrastructure needs will have to be.  And we need to make it as easy as possible for these people to have a role/job in these communities, to reduce the probability of creating slums
Slums in early larger US cities like the ones in New York created a lot of problems.  Hygiene was extremely poor, and infectious diseases were the number one cause of death.  Dead animals and excrement lined the streets, safe drinking water was hard to come by, and the amount of people employed regularly was very low.  In fact, we often think cities are as densely populated now as they have every been, but that is not the case.  Cities used to be much more densely populated, and it was not out of the ordinary to have a whole family living in one room.  Since than we have made some significant improvements to extinguishing the side effects of urbanization, but maybe not as much as you would think.  Public housing is the low income housing in urban areas.  It is often ridden with crime, low sanitation, and lack of infrastructure even today.  As a country we are trying to reduce this.  We do this by making housing more affordable, creating better and more jobs, and getting crime rates down.  Of course this is easier said than done, and will take years to make any significant impact.  But even as we work towards reducing some current problems, the future ad increased population will surely bring about some new problems.